EDUCATIONAL
PHILOSOPHY
The Board of Education is dedicated to educating students
to develop desired moral, ethical, social and cultural values and
responsibilities, to stimulate and expand a continual learning process and to
cultivate an understanding and appreciation of the rights and responsibilities
of American citizens, which will enable them to function effectively as
independent individuals in and strengthen our democratic society and promote
the individual well-being of each member of that society.
The Board believes that a school cannot be separated from
its community. Rather, it should be a
part of and model for that community.
The schools should set an intellectual tone from which our townspeople
can profit. The schools should operate
with order, imagination, dignity and understanding; thereby setting an example
for the daily affairs of the community.
The educational program will accommodate young people
from a wide variety of backgrounds and a wide variety of abilities, needs and
interests. The Board holds to the
philosophy that our educational program must satisfy all of these young
people. The educational program will
provide each child with the fundamental academic skills and basic knowledge
required for his/her maximum educational development, the opportunity for each
child to develop his/her interests and abilities to the fullest extent
according to his/her individual potential, and special services to promote the
physical, mental and emotional development of each child.
The Board also believes that the differences among our
students do not make equality of educational opportunity an impossible
goal. Rather, these differences make
the goal more important.
It is the district's goal to foster in students good work
habits, integrity, self-discipline, good sportsmanship, self-confidence and a
sense of purpose. Co-curricular
offerings must help young people meet their avocational goals. Extracurricular activities will be offered
when possible to enhance the academic program.
The Board encourages parents and teachers to offer their
expertise in helping to develop a school environment that is academically
challenging, psychologically satisfying and socially fulfilling for students at
all levels. The objectives of an
educational program are best realized when mutual understanding, cooperation,
and effective communications exist among the home, community and school.
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY
The Board of Education, its officers and employees, shall not discriminate against any student, employee or applicant on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, religion, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, disability or predisposing genetic characteristic.
This policy of nondiscrimination includes access by students to educational programs, counseling services for students, course offerings, and student activities, as well as recruitment and appointment of employees and employment pay, benefits, advancement and/or terminations.
The Board authorizes the Superintendent of Schools to establish such rules, regulations and procedures necessary to implement and maintain this policy.
Cross-ref: 5030, Student Complaints and Grievances
9140.1, Staff Complaints and Grievances
Ref: Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §12101 et seq.
Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000d et seq.
Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §2000e et seq.
Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq.
§504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §794
Individuals with Disabilities Education Law, 20 U.S.C. §§1400 et seq.
Executive Law §290 et seq. (New York State Human Rights Law)
Education Law §§313(3)
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
Revised date: February 25, 2009
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
SECTION 504/AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The Sachem Central School District does not discriminate on the basis of disability with regard to admission, access to services, treatment, or employment in its programs or other activities. If any person believes that the Sachem Central School District or any of the District’s staff has violated the principles and/or regulations of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which includes alleged discrimination by District staff based on the conduct of students or other third parties, he/she may bring forward a complaint in accordance with the following procedure.
This procedure does not preclude informal solutions or restrict the right of the complainant to file formal complaints with State and Federal agencies or seek private counsel for complaints alleging discrimination at any time.
If discrimination is determined to have occurred, the District will take prompt steps to correct any effects of the discrimination and prevent further occurrence.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Step 1:
The complaint must be filed in writing by the complainant. A form to assist with this process will be provided by the School District on request. To be considered, the written complaint must fully set out the circumstances giving rise to the alleged complaint and must be filed with the District 504 Coordinator.
District 504 Coordinator
Paul A. Stellino
Sachem Central School District
51 School Street
Lake Ronkonkoma, NY 11779
(631) 471 1899
Step 2:
The District 504 Coordinator will conduct an investigation of the allegation(s). The parent, student, employee or third party will be given full and fair opportunity to present evidence, including witnesses, relevant to the issues raised under the complaint. The investigation will be completed and recommendations made to the Superintendent or his/her designee within thirty (30) work days of receipt of a written complaint. If a District 504 Coordinator is the subject of the written complaint, an impartial investigator shall be appointed to conduct the investigation.
Step 3:
The Superintendent or his/her designee will review all issues raised and evidence presented and provide the complainant with a written decision within ten (10) working days of receipt of the investigator’s recommendation.
If following Step 3, the Complaint is not resolved to the Complainant’s satisfaction, the Complainant may file a complaint of discrimination on the basis of disability against the District in court, or with State or Federal agencies, including the U. S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 32 Old Slip, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10005.
Adoption Date: April 21, 2010
SCHOOL
DISTRICT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
To further its educational philosophy, the Board of Education
establishes the following goals and objectives:
1. to
employ the best possible school staff, including both professional and support
personnel;
2. to
encourage the development of positive and supportive interpersonal
relationships among the students, the staff and members of the community;
3. to
ensure that staff, students, and parents are afforded opportunities for
meaningful participation in the development and evaluation of programs and
policies;
4. to
strive for maximum efficiency in the use of district resources to meet the
goals and objectives of the various programs and services;
5. to
provide educational programs and services which fulfill the needs of the
district and comply with Commissioner's Regulations; and
6. to
promote the development of programs and services which encourage cooperative
interaction between the community-at-large and district staff and students.
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
GOALS FOR
INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM
The mission of the Sachem School Community is to graduate
students who will be motivated, respectful, lifelong learners, well prepared to
succeed and contribute to their society.
A competent, enthusiastic staff, in cooperation with
parents and community members, will provide a challenging, comprehensive,
relevant curriculum in a safe, nurturing environment.
Sachem’s Graduation Standards
Citizenship
The skills, knowledge, and dispositions necessary to be a
responsible, contributing and knowledgeable member of the political, economic,
and social institutions of the U.S. and the world.
Communications
Proficiency in the use and understanding of all forms of
communications: reading, writing, speaking, listening, music, dance, art,
literature, world languages, technological information services, personal and
social interactions.
Health and Wellness
The knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to
establish and sustain a pattern of regular physical activity, a sense of
self-worth, and a commitment to personal wellness which serves as a personal
resource for leading a healthy, productive, and self-fulfilling life.
Practical Living
Skills/Career Preparation
The knowledge, skills and dispositions which will enhance
personal life management, while understanding the relationship of their
interests, abilities, and aptitudes to career choice; demonstrate interpersonal
knowledge and skills necessary to meet daily living responsibilities and
achieve a successful and productive career.
Problem Solving
The ability to achieve solutions to problems by bringing
together the skills, knowledge, and dispositions necessary to determine the
existence of a problem; set parameters for the problem and its solutions; pull
together available resources; and allocate these resources in the best way to
achieve appropriate solutions.
0210
Technological Literacy
An understanding of the current technologies and skills
necessary to adapt to the changing technological world. (This standard is also to be integrated
within the other six standards.)
Understanding Systems
Systems fall into many categories, including social,
political, scientific, economic, technological, and environmental. Students will demonstrate competency in
“understanding systems,” knowing how the components of these systems affect one
another and interact. This will include
competence regarding the individual’s ability to operate in various systems and
understand the consequences of change.
The district fully accepts the concept that learning is a
lifelong process, and toward this end, actively encourages people of all ages
to participate in a wide range of activities.
Cross-ref: 4000, Instructional Goals
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
EVALUATION OF
SCHOOL BOARD
OPERATIONAL
PROCEDURES
The Board of Education shall review the effectiveness of
its internal operations at least once annually. The Superintendent of Schools and others who work regularly with
the Board shall be asked to participate in this review and to suggest ways by
which the Board can improve its functioning as a deliberative and legislative
body.
The Board shall set forth the standards by which it will
evaluate itself, taking into account the following:
1. the
district's needs and the Board's ability to meet such needs;
2. the
district's goals for its instructional programs;
3. the
Board's relationship with the Superintendent and district staff;
4. the
Board's relationship with its supervisory district (BOCES); and
5. the
community's perception of Board members as educational leaders.
All decisions of the Board are to be supported by as much
objective evidence as possible. Implied
in this approach is an assumption that any school board is capable of
improvement. The chances that improvement
will result are enhanced if evaluation is carried out systematically in
accordance with good planning, conscientious follow-through, and careful
assessment of results.
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
EVALUATION OF
SUPERINTENDENT
The Board of Education recognizes that student achievement, district progress and community satisfaction with the schools are all in large part affected by the superintendent’s performance. The Board also recognizes the superintendent cannot function effectively without periodic feedback on performance, and is committed to ensuring that the superintendent is evaluated annually as required by Commissioner’s regulations.
The purposes of the evaluation shall be to:
1. Gauge the district’s progress toward the goals the Board has charged the superintendent to accomplish.
2. Provide a basis for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the Board and the superintendent and to aid in the professional development of both parties.
3. Strengthen the working relationship between the Board and the superintendent.
4. Provide a basis for commending, rewarding and reinforcing good work.
The evaluation shall focus on the goals the Board sets for the superintendent each year as well as the duties and competencies specified in the superintendent’s job description.
The procedures the Board uses for evaluating the superintendent shall be filed in the district office and available for review by any individual no later than September 10th of each year.
Cross-Ref: 3120, Duties of the Superintendent
Ref: 8 NYCRR §100.2(o)(2)(v) (Performance review of superintendent)
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
Revision date: September 21, 1999
Revision date: November 18, 2009
ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW POLICY
EVALUATION OF PROFESSIONAL STAFF
Teacher Evaluation Program
The primary purpose of the evaluation of teachers shall be to ensure the highest quality of education being offered to students. This requires the development of a process whereby all staff members may increase the effectiveness of their services to the educational program. A broader purpose of the evaluation process is to assess teacher competence, to make decisions regarding the assignment and employment of staff, and to verify that district educational goals are being implemented and achieved.
I.Program Assumption
The Teacher Evaluation Program is based upon the following assumptions:
A.Teachers and other instructional personnel have a responsibility to demonstrate interest in their own development by acquiring new knowledge and skills.
B.Teachers and other instructional personnel have a commitment to work effectively with their colleagues and welcome regular feedback about the quality of their work.
C.Teachers understand their professional expectations and responsibilities.
D.A proper climate exists to encourage the self-development of each teacher.
E.Professional goals of teachers shall be compatible with organizational goals.
II.Responsibility for Supervision and Evaluation
All staff members will be evaluated on an annual basis. It is the responsibility of the building principal to inform each staff member of this policy and to review with staff the procedures for evaluation.
The principal holds the primary responsibility for teacher supervision and evaluation. Principals are assisted in this function by supervisors, directors, Assistant Principals and additional administrative/supervisory personnel as designated by the Superintendent of Schools. Annual evaluation reports are the responsibility of the principal(s) with input from other administrative/supervisory personnel. Classroom observation reports are the responsibility of the administrator or supervisor observing the lesson.
III.Staff Members Possessing a Transitional or Initial Certificate
For individuals possessing a transitional or initial certificate, an evaluation of the "teacher's portfolio" (components of the teaching/learning process) will be required. The portfolio may include any of the following: formal and informal observations, a sample of lesson plans, a sample of student work and student assessment instruments, and the teacher's reflection of his/her classroom performance in the post observation conference.
IV.Teacher Improvement Plans
Individuals whose overall performance is evaluated as unsatisfactory by a school administrator will be required to undertake a teacher improvement plan established by the district in consultation with the teacher.
V.Evaluation of Student Services Staff
The performance review criteria and evaluation reports set forth in this policy and regulation may be altered by the district in order to meet the needs of student services professionals or other professional staff.
VI.All principals and supervisory personnel engaged in performance reviews of teachers and student services staff shall participate in training on performance evaluation pursuant to a program established by the Superintendent of Schools.
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
Revision date: March 16, 2004
EVALUATION OF
ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
The district’s evaluation policy shall be the basis for
the evaluation of Sachem’s supervisors and administrators.
Each supervisor and administrator shall be evaluated
annually by his/her immediate supervisor or his/her designee.
The evaluation will consist of the following:
6. A
narrative written by the supervisor describing to what degree he/she carries
out his/her job description effectively including strengths and weaknesses.
6. An
assessment of necessary behaviors and skills for effective performance.
6. A
narrative describing to what degree previously set goals have been met.
6. A
professional improvement plan mutually agreed upon by the supervisor and the
administrator or supervisor being evaluated.
6. The
development of future long- and short-term goals that will carry out the
mission of the school.
Adoption
date: November 18, 1997
EVALUATION OF
SUPPORT STAFF
The Board of Education believes that
the evaluation of support staff is an essential component of supervision and
decision-making regarding staff promotions and retention. The Board therefore directs the Superintendent
of Schools to develop standards and procedures for the evaluation of all
support staff.
Each support staff member will be
formally evaluated once each year by his/her immediate supervisor or other
designated person.
The purposes of support staff
evaluations are:
1. to
provide an objective basis for employee improvement;
2. to
maintain salaries commensurate with job requirements and responsibilities; and
3. to ensure that employees meet
performance standards.
If requested by the Civil Service
Department, the district will keep and report performance ratings of civil
service employees prior to making a permanent appointment. For those support staff members who are
members of a collective bargaining unit, permanent appointments will be made as
per their negotiated agreement.
Adoption date: November 18, 1997
EVALUATION OF
INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAMS
The Board of Education recognizes
that education is a continuous process that cannot be satisfactorily achieved
without the coordination and cooperation of all components of the system. To achieve the highest quality of education
on all levels, a critical appraisal of the program as it operates in each
school and at each level is essential.
The Superintendent of Schools shall develop standards and procedures for
the evaluation of instructional programs.
The purposes of evaluating the
instructional programs are to:
1. indicate
instructional strengths and weaknesses;
2. provide information needed for advance
planning;
3. provide data for public information;
4. show
the relationship between achievement and the school system's stated goals; and
5. assess
the suitability of the instructional program in terms of community
requirements.
The Board shall receive regular
reports of the results of instructional program evaluations.
Ref: 8 NYCRR §100.2(m)
Adoption
date: November 18, 1997
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLANS
The Board of Education directs the
Superintendent of Schools to develop a comprehensive school improvement plan
for those school buildings identified by the Commissioner of Education as most
in need of assistance (if any), in accordance with Commissioner's Regulations.
The school improvement plan must be
developed in consultation with teachers, administrators, students, parents, and
appropriate school service professionals, as well as with staff of the State
Education Department (SED) or others assigned to assist the planning
process. The plan must address the
areas of deficiency and any changes in the school program required by the
Commissioner.
The Board must approve the plan and
submit it to SED no later than April 30 of the school year in which the
Commissioner requires it. The plan must
be implemented no later than the September following its approval. The Board will comply with any additional
requirements of SED that arise as it monitors the implementation of the plan.
Ref: 8 NYCRR §100.2(m)(3)
Adoption
date: November 18, 1997